This court dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed in 2019 as infructuous due to prolonged inactivity by both the applicant and the prosecution, citing a three-year lapse without appearances, effectively vacating any interim protection.
Interim protection granted, if any, is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:164349
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50640 of 2019
Applicant :- Pramod @ Pintoo Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Kamal Dev Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Order Date :- 16.8.2023 Siddhant
Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application filed in 2019, where no appearance was made by the applicant for over three years, can be allowed.
Whether the application has become infructuous due to the efflux of time and lack of prosecutorial interest.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶8
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. GopalReferred¶9
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. Gopal, (2021) 12 SCC 612 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pramod @ Pintoo
Krishan Pahal
Siddhant Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
