The High Court dismissed a delayed anticipatory bail application filed in 2019 as infructuous due to the efflux of time and lack of appearance by the applicant, citing statutory disposal timelines and precedents against routine adjournments.
Application dismissed as infructuous; any interim protection granted stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:164334
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 51122 of 2019
Applicant :- Furkan And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Hemant Sharma
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Order Date :- 16.8.2023 Siddhant
Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a delayed anticipatory bail application filed in 2019 can be allowed after significant lapse of time without appearance.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶8
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. GopalReferred¶8
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. Gopal, (2021) 12 SCC 612 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Furkan And 4 Others
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
