The single judge dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed in 2019 as infructuous due to prolonged delay and lack of appearance by the applicant over several years, noting the statute limits disposal time. No interim protection was granted.
Application dismissed as infructuous; any interim protection is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:165498
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 54089 of 2019
Applicant :- Shiv Poojan Jaiswal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Subhash Gosain Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 17.8.2023 Vikas
[Krishan Pahal, J.]
Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application filed in 2019 should be allowed after a long period of inactivity and pendency spanning several years.
Whether prolonged delay without the applicant appearing renders the application infructuous.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶8
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. GopalReferred¶9
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. Gopal, (2021) 12 SCC 612 · Who else cites this
Shiv Poojan Jaiswal
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
