The court dismissed an undated anticipatory bail application filed in 2019 as infructuous due to prolonged pendency without applicant participation, vacating any interim protection.
Application dismissed as infructuous; interim protection, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:165528
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52215 of 2019
Applicant :- Anjum Praveen Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Azhar Hussain Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 17.8.2023 Vikas
[Krishan Pahal, J.]
Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application can be allowed that has remained pending without any application action for several years.
Whether the application has become infructuous due to the efflux of time and inactivity by the applicant.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶8
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. GopalReferred¶9
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. Gopal, (2021) 12 SCC 612 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anjum Praveen
Krishan Pahal
Vikas Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Krishan Pahal and Vikas Verma
Parties & counsel
