The petition was dismissed due to lack of instructions from the counsel, as stated by the Advocate on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 34102 of 1993
Petitioner :- Tameshwar Singh And Others Respondent :- D.D.C. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- P.P. Chaudhary,Avinash Chandra Srivastava,Tripathi B.G. Bhai Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,Pradeep Narain Pandey,Pramod Kumar Singh,R.N.Pandey,S.L. Yadav,Shashi Bhushan
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Sri Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Tripathi B.G. Bhai, learned counsel for the petitioners has made statement that he has no instructions in the writ petition.
It is accordingly, dismissed for want of instructions.
Sri Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate appears on behalf of respondents.
Order Date :- 22.11.2022 Rohit
Digitally signed by ROHIT DAS Date: 2022.11.22 15:00:25 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Tameshwar Singh
D.D.C.
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
