High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous since the respondent authority had already revised and decided the matter addressed by the petition.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2849 of 2022
Petitioner :- Jai Prakash And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Singh,Ashok Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Learned Standing Counsel has filed personal affidavit of D.D.C., Jaunpur, which is taken on record.
Instructions have also been received by learned Standing Counsel, which are taken on record, wherein it has been stated that the revision of the petitioner has been decided. Copy of the order has been annexed with the affidavit.
The order dated 21.11.2022 passed by the D.D.C. has been placed before this Court alongwith instructions.
In view of the above, no order is required to passed in this petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 22.11.2022 Ruchi Agrahari
Digitally signed by RUCHI AGRAHARI Date: 2022.11.22 15:18:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Jai Prakash
An Another
State Of U.P.
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
