Sheo Kumar v. D.D.C.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition filed by Sheo Kumar against D.D.C. was dismissed as withdrawn upon the application of the petitioner's counsel.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 21369 of 1993
Petitioner :- Sheo Kumar Respondent :- D.D.C. Counsel for Petitioner :- S.N. Singh,A.K. Rai,Anil Kumar Rai,R.N.Singh,S.D.Ojha,Vishnu Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Shashi Kumar,Achal Singh Vats,Anuj Kumar,C.K.Parekh,D.K.Mishra,Lavlesh Kumar,Namwar Singh,R.C.Yadav,R.P.Yadav,S. Rai,S.C.,S.C.Verma,S.K.Singh,V.K.Singh
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Order on Withdrawal Application No.21 of 2022
Sri Anil Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he wants to withdraw this writ petition. Hence it may be dismissed as withdrawn.
This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 21.11.2022 Ruchi Agrahari
Digitally signed by RUCHI AGRAHARI Date: 2022.11.21 13:46:08 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sheo Kumar
- respondent
D.D.C.
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/21369/1993
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court