The High Court dismissed the writ petition as it was not pressed by the petitioner's counsel in the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 34888 of 2001
Petitioner :- Mohan Lal And Another Respondent :- D.D.C. Bareilly And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Faujdar Rai,Akash Gupta,C.K.Rai,Dr. S.B. Singh,Prabhakar Singh,V.M.Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anil Srivastava,Arpit Agarwal,Gyanendra Agarwal,Praveen Kumar Mishra,Sanjay Kumar Singh,V.K.Singh
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Sri Akash Gupta, counsel for the petitioners has given statement that he does not wishes to press this writ petition.
Sri Arpit Agarwal, counsel for the respondent nos. 7 and 8 has no objection.
The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 23.11.2022 Rohit
Digitally signed by ROHIT DAS Date: 2022.11.23 16:01:25 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohan Lal And Another
D.D.C. Bareilly And Others
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
