Thakur Das v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
None
What the court decided
Court No. - 93 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1255 of 1991 Revisionist :- Thakur Das Opposite Party :- State Counsel for Revisionist :- P.P. Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised. No one has appeared on behalf of the revisionists. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This revision has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 20.09.1991 passed by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Jhansi dismissing Criminal Appeal No. 122 of 1990 preferred against the judgment and order dated 09.07.1990 passed by the learned IInd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi in Case No. 206 of 1990, convicting and sentencing the revisionists under Sections 325/34, 323/34 I.P.C. with a maximum punishment of one year rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs. 200/- with default stipulation.
Learned A.G.A. submits that the present revision is of the year, 1991 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionists and their counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and orders passed by the courts below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
I have gone through the judgment and orders passed by the appellate court as well as by the court below and also perused the record. I have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned A.G.A. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionists to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in both the judgments and orders passed by the courts below.
In view of the above, after having gone through both the judgments and orders under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the judgments and orders under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned A.G.A. that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Thakur Das
- respondent
State
Coram
Shamim Ahmed
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1255/1991
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court