In Crl. Rev. No. 1058 of 1998, this Court dismissed the revision filed by the convicted person against the conviction for rash driving and causing hurt by dangerous means, noting loss of interest and absence of arguments from the revisionist.
Revision against conviction dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1058 of 1998
Revisionist :- Mohkam Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- V.K. Chaturvedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision.
Sri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General, assisted by Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned A.G.A.-I for the State is present.
This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 10.7.98 passed by IInd Addl. Sessions Judge Agra in criminal appeal no.34 of 1993 by which the appellate court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the judgment passed by 10th ACJM Agra in case no.2281 of 1991 under Section 279/337 IPC P.S. Jagner dated 26.2.93 by which the trial court has convicted the revisionist for 6 months R.I. under Section 279 IPC and 6 months R.I(. under Section 337 IPC.
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the present revision is of the year 1998 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and orders passed by the courts below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
I have gone through the judgment and order passed by the appellate court as well as by the court below and have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned AGA. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in both the judgments and orders passed by the courts below.
In view of the above, after having gone through both the judgments and orders under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the judgments and orders under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned AGA that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his
counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onward transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.
The file is consigned to record.
Order Date :- 3.3.2022 SP
Digitally signed by SALIM PRAVEJ Date: 2022.03.10 14:13:23 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohkam Singh
State of U.P.
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
