Dismissed

Balanshahar Datt v. Brahma Nand and 2 Others

Allahabad HC4 Mar 2022CRLR/1250/1991

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

No one appeared on behalf of the revisionist in Criminal Revision No. 1250 of 1991. The High Court noted the petitioner's loss of interest due to the lapse of time and found no illegality in the impugned acquittal order, leading to the dismissal of the revision.

What did the court decide?

The criminal revision petition is dismissed with no illegalities or infirmities found in the impugned order.

Balanshahar Datt Vs Brahma Nand and 2 Others — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 93 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1250 of 1991 Revisionist :- Balanshahar Datt Opposite Party :- Brahma Nand And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- D.N. Wali Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.

¶3

List has been revised. No one has appeared on behalf of the revisionist.

¶4

As per the office report dated 08.02.2019 notice sent to the revisionist has been served personally upon him, but till date neither any vakalatnama has been filed nor anyone has put in appearance on behalf of revisionist to contest the case. It appears that the revisionist has lost interest to pursue the matter.

¶5

Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.

¶6

This revision has been filed challenging the order dated 16.05.1991 passed by VIth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Meerut in Session Trial No. 60 of 1990, acquitting the opposite parties from the charges framed against them under Sections 302, 323, 324 I.P.C.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. submits that the present revision is of the year, 1991 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order passed by the trial court, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.

¶8

I have gone through the impugned order passed by the trial court and also perused the record. I have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned A.G.A. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in the impugned order passed by the trial court.

¶9

In view of the above, after having gone through the order under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same needs no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the order under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned A.G.A. that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.

¶10

Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.

¶11

Interim order, if any, stands discharged.

¶12

Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onwards transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.

¶13

Let the lower court record, if any, be returned back to the court concerned.

¶14

The file is consigned to record.

¶15

Order Date :- 4.3.2022 /Mustaqeem.

¶16

Digitally signed by MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN Date: 2022.04.04 17:45:15 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Balanshahar Datt v. Brahma Nand and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balanshahar Datt v. Brahma Nand and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagdish Prasad Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohkam Singh Vs State of U.P.

Satya Pal Singh Vs Veer Pal and Another

Preetam Singh and Others Vs State of U.P.

Vivek Chandra and Others Vs Col. P.C. Rawat

Thakur Das Vs State