Dismissed

Satya Pal Singh v. Veer Pal and Another

Allahabad HC3 Mar 2022CRLR/1015/1997

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed a criminal revision filed under Article 227 against an acquittal. The court noted the absence of the revisionist and adopted the Advocate General's view that the matter was stale due to the passage of time and no illegality remained.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision No. 1015 of 1997 dismissed as there is no illegality and the matter is stale.

Satya Pal Singh Vs Veer Pal and… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 93

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1015 of 1997 Revisionist :- Satya Pal Singh Opposite Party :- Veer Pal And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- R.B. Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate

¶3

Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.

¶4

List has been revised.

¶5

None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision.

¶6

Sri Viabhav Aanand, learned A.G.A. is present.

¶7

This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 15.05.1997 passed by XIIth Additional Session Judge, Ghaziabad in S.T. No. 483/96, whereby he has acquitted the opposite party No.1 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 452 and 504 I.P.C.

¶8

Sri Viabhav Aanand submits that the present revision is of the year, 1997 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order passed by the court below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.

¶9

I have gone through the judgment and order passed by the court below and also perused the record. I have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned A.G.A.. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order passed by the court below.

¶10

In view of the above, after having gone through the judgment and order under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned A.G.A. that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.

¶11

Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.

¶12

Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onwards transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.

¶13

The file is consigned to record.

¶14

Let the lower Court record, if any, be returned back to the concerned Court.

¶15

Order Date :- 3.3.2022 Arvind

¶16

Digitally signed by ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.03.24 17:37:55 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Satya Pal Singh v. Veer Pal and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satya Pal Singh v. Veer Pal and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babli Sharma Vs State of U.P. and Another

Manoj @ Nanha Vs State of U.P.

Akash (Minor) Vs State of U.P.

Jagdish Prasad Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohkam Singh Vs State of U.P.

Mohammad Umar Vs Family Court Bareilly and Another