Lal Bahadur v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court consigned the present Criminal Appeal to the record and directed the office to delink it from a composite Criminal Appeal. The appeal was not pressed.
What did the court decide?
Consigned the appeal to the record and directed delinking from another appeal.
What the court decided
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 90 of 1984
Appellant :- Lal Bahadur Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Inperson Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Saroj Yadav,J.
None appears on behalf of the appellant to press this Appeal. Shri Chandra Shekhar Pandey, learned AGA for the State of U.P. is present.
It transpires from the record that the appellants were granted bail by Co-ordinate Single Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.03.1984.
It appears from the record that the appellant- Lal Bahadur has preferred a composite Criminal Appeal No.845 of 1983 through his regular Counsel Shri Km. C. Mani against the impugned order and judgment dated 15.11.1983 passed by the trial Court.
In view of the aforesaid, the present Criminal Appeal No.90 of 1984 be consigned to record .
Office is directed to delink Criminal Appeal No.90 of 1984 from Criminal Appeal No.845 of 1983.
(Mrs. Saroj Yadav, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Lal Bahadur
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Ramesh Sinha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/90/1984
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court