Braham Jeet v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant, Braham Jeet, filed an anticipatory bail application in a cheating and forged documents case but withdrew it. The court dismissed the application with liberty to file another.
The applicant, Braham Jeet, filed an anticipatory bail application in a cheating and forged documents case but withdrew it. The court dismissed the application with liberty to file another.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3656 of 2022
Applicant :- Braham Jeet Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Kumar Ashutosh Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Heard Sri Kumar Ashutosh Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of applicant Braham Jeet under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with a prayer grant anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 426 of 2020, for offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station- Expressway, DistrictGautam Budh Nagar, directly before this Court.
After some argument learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press the present anticipatory bail application.
Hence, anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate bail application before the Court of competent jurisdiction.
Order Date :- 7.5.2022 PS
Digitally signed by POOJA SHARMA Date: 2022.05.16 10:36:29 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Braham Jeet
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court