The Court directed the Respondent Tehsildar (Judicial), Shahganj, to decide the pending restoration application within four months of receiving the order, after hearing all parties, to avoid delay.
Respondent directed to decide the restoration application within four months of receiving the order after hearing all parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6073 of 2021
Petitioner :- Raj Mani Respondent :- Tehsildar (Judicial) And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
From the record, it transpires that this writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondent no. 1/Tehsildar (Judicial), Shahganj, District Jaunpur to decide the restoration application in Case No. T-201814360104360 (Rajmani Vs. Bhulai) within a stipulated period.
No useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, as such, respondent no. 1/Tehsildar (Judicial), Shahganj, District Jaunpur, is directed to decide the restoration application in Case No. T-201814360104360 (Rajmani Vs. Bhulai), in accordance with law, preferably within a period of next four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order downloaded from the website of the High Court, after hearing all the parties concerned.
Writ petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 6.8.2021 Shekhar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent Tehsildar is directed to decide the pending restoration application within a stipulated period.
Raj Mani
Tehsildar (Judicial)
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
