Writ petition challenging a notice under the U.P. Revenue Code was dismissed by the Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J. on the ground that the petitioner had an alternative remedy available under Section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
The writ petition was dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2794 of 2021
Petitioner :- Kamlesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anup Kumar Khare Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Deepak Gaur,Krishna Kant Singh
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard Sri Anup Kumar Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Deepak Gaur, learned counsel for respondent no. 4.
This writ petition has been filed assailing the the notice issued under Rule 67(2) and 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2016.
At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel has pointed out that petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for filing an appeal before the Collector.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 19.7.2021 V.S.Singh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed in light of the existence of an alternative remedy.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kamlesh Kumar
State Of U.P.
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
