The Court disposed of the writ petition challenging a termination order by deciding it on the same terms as judgment in Writ A No. 2832 of 2021, making those directions applicable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9003 of 2020
Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar -Iii Respondent :- U.P.State Road Transport Corporation At Lucknow And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhawesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Anuj Srivastava,Dharmendra Dhar Dubey
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.
The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 9.10.2018 whereby the services of the petitioner, who was employed on contractual appointment, was terminated by way of a stigmatic order.
The facts of the present case are squarely covered by the judgment of this Court passed in Writ A No. 2832 of 2021.
Considering the arguments raised at the Bar and the judgment of this Court in dated 18.2.2021, the writ petition is disposed off on the same terms and conditions as in the judgment dated 18.2.2021 passed in Writ Petition (A) No. 2832 of 2021. Directions issued in the order dated 18.2.2021 shall be applicable to the present case also.
Order Date :- 6.8.2021
vinay
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's terminating order dated 9.10.2018 can be disposed of on the same terms as the judgment in Writ A No. 2832 of 2021.
Pawan Kumar
U.P.State Road Transport Corporation
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
