Satish Chandra Sharma v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging a rejection of regularization. Following Vijay Shayam Dwivedi, the Court quashed the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Regularization Committee to reconsider the claim without invoking Section 33-G(8).
What did the court decide?
Order dated 24.5.2021 quashed; matter remanded to Regularization Committee to reconsider claim within four months without Section 33-G(8).