The High Court rejected an anticipatory bail application without examining merits but directed the lower court to dispose of the regular bail application expeditiously if the applicants surrender.
Anticipatory bail application rejected; direction to lower court to dispose of regular bail application expeditiously upon surrender.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8653 of 2021
Applicant :- Smt. Sarla And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicants Smt. Sarla, Kamlesh, Rohit and Raju in Case Crime No. 0449 of 2020, under sections 420, 120-B, 323, 406 I.P.C., P.S.- Kotwali Kalpi, District -Jalaun.
Learned counsel for the applicants at the very outset has made a request that a direction may be issued to the court below to consider the bail application when given on the same day and the application for anticipatory bail may be rejected.
In view of the request made above, Anticipatory Bail Application is rejected without making any observation on the merits of the case.
A direction is however given to the court below that in case applicants surrender and give bail application, the same shall be disposed of expeditiously and preferably on the same day in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 17.9.2021 Bhanu
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Sarla And 3 Others
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
