Brijendra v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application as not pressed when the applicant sought a direction to reject it on the same day.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail application rejected as not pressed; direction given for expeditious disposal of regular bail upon surrender.
What the court decided
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6847 of 2021
Applicant :- Brijendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicant Brijendra in Case Crime No. 0051 of 2021, under sections 193, 420, 120-B I.P.C., P.S.- Gadhmukteshwar, District - Hapud.
Learned counsel for the applicant at the very outset has made a request that a direction may be issued to the court below to consider the bail application when given on the same day and the application for anticipatory bail may be rejected.
In view of the request made above, Anticipatory Bail Application is rejected as not pressed.
A direction is however given to the court below that in case applicant surrenders and give bail application, the same shall be disposed of expeditiously and preferably on the same day in accordance with law.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Brijendra
Coram
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/6847/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court