No one appeared for applicants; application dismissed by a single judge for want of prosecution.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10346 of 2009
Applicant :- Bheem Prasad And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Siddharth Saran Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,S.K.Pandey
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
The case has been called out in the revised list. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicants.
Sri S.K. Pandey, learned Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party no.2. Sri Vaibhav Anand Singh, learned AGA for the State is present.
The application is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 24.11.2021 P Kesari
Bheem Prasad And Others
State of U.P.
Another
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
