The court dismissed the criminal revision application under Section 482 of the CrPC as infructuous, noting no appearance or cause of action, and vacated any interim order.
Application dismissed as infructuous; Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1054 of 2009
Applicant :- Smt.Madhu Seth Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manu Khare Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Brijesh Sahai,Rameshwari Prasad
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
No one has put in appearance to press the application.
It appears that either the cause of action no more survives or it has otherwise become infructuous and probably for this reason none is interested to get this matter decided on merits and that is why, counsel for the applicant is not present.
The application is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.11.2021 SY
Smt. Madhu Seth
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
