In a Section 482 application regarding a criminal proceeding, the applicant failed to appear and press the matter. Finding the cause of action potentially infructuous, the court dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10199 of 2009
Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajnish Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Anil Kumar Singh,K.L.Bind
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
The case has been called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance to press the application.
Sri Vaibhav Anand Singh, learned AGA for the State is present.
It appears that either the cause of action no more survives or it has otherwise become infructuous and probably for this reason none is interested to get this matter decided on merits and that is why, counsel for the applicant is not present.
The application is, accordingly, dismissed as infrcutuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 24.11.2021 P Kesari
Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
