Single judge bench dismissed an unpresssed undersec. 482 CrPC application as infructuous due to non-appearance and insurmountable cause of action, vacating interim orders.
Application dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 32607 of 2008
Applicant :- Vinod Salian Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Prabhakar Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
No one has put in appearance to press the application.
It appears that either the cause of action no more survives or it has otherwise become infructuous and probably for this reason none is interested to get this matter decided on merits and that is why, counsel for the applicant is not present.
The application is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.11.2021 SY
Vinod Salian
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
