Ravindra Srivastava v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33580 of…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33580 of 2008
Applicant :- Ravindra Srivastava Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Shoeb Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
No one has put in appearance to press the application.
It appears that either the cause of action no more survives or it has otherwise become infructuous and probably for this reason none is interested to get this matter decided on merits and that is why, counsel for the applicant is not present.
The application is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.11.2021 SY
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ravindra Srivastava
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/33580/2008
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court