In this dismissed writ petition, the High Court held the petition infructuous due to efflux of time, granting liberty to apply if the cause of action survives, and vacating any interim order.
Liberty granted to file an appropriate application if the cause of action survives; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21776 of 1998
Petitioner :- U.P.Sunni Central Board Of Wakf Respondent :- Civil Judge Senior Division Ballia And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- P.A.Ansari,P.K.Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,SC
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition.
The writ petition is of the year 1998.
From a perusal of the record it appears that this writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move the Court with an appropriate application in the event cause of action survives.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 20.11.2020 SKT/-
U.P.Sunni Central Board Of Wakf
Civil Judge Senior Division Ballia And Others
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
