High Court dismissed a 2009 writ petition as infructuous by efflux of time due to lack of appearance by the petitioner's counsel. Liberty granted for fresh application if cause of action survives.
Liberty granted to the petitioner to move the Court with an appropriate application in the event cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9320 of 2009
Petitioner :- Krishna Nand Pandey Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kuamr Mishra,Birendra S. Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anil Kumar Misra,B.R. Maurya
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition.
The writ petition is of the year 2009.
From a perusal of the record it appears that this writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move the Court with an appropriate application in the event cause of action survives.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 20.11.2020 SKT/-
Krishna Nand Pandey
State of U.P. and Others
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
