Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition had become infructuous. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition on that ground.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8861 of 2009
Petitioner :- Mahendra Pratap Pandey Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Sri Uma Nath Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous and it may be dismissed as such.
In view of the said statement, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 19.11.2020 SKT/-
Mahendra Pratap Pandey
State of U.P.
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
