The Hon'ble Court dismissed Writ petition no. 7888 of 2009 filed by Smt. Geeta Pandey against the State of U.P. as infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel's statement that the petition had become infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7888 of 2009
Petitioner :- Smt. Geeta Pandey Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gajendra Pratap,Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Sri Uma Nath Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, states that the instant writ petition has become infructuous, hence it may be dismissed.
In view of the said statement, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 18.11.2020 SKT/-
Smt. Geeta Pandey
State of U.P.
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
