Allowed

Mohd. Saif v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC9 Sept 2020BAIL/26578/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge granted bail to applicant Mohd. Saif involved under U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, requiring personal bond and sureties on conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and ensure trial court appearance.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with personal bond and two local sureties subject to conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and ensuring court appearance.

Mohd. Saif Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26578 of 2020

¶2

Applicant :- Mohd. Saif Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Amaresh Yadava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State respondent.

¶5

It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that according to the gang chart, copy of which has been filed as annexure-2 to the affidavit, only one case is pending against the applicant. It is also contended that in the aforesaid case the applicant has already been enlarged on bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 20403 of 2020, Mohd. Saif v. State of U.P., vide order dated 07.08.2020, and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next contended that the applicant is in jail since 05.03.2020 and in case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶6

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶7

Perused the first information report as well as the averments made in the application.

¶8

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant- Mohd. Saif, involved in case crime no. 69 of 2020, under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Gambhirpur, District Azamgarh be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned on the following conditions that :

¶9

the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

¶10

the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

¶11

the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.

¶12

In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the order granting bail shall automatically be vacated. Order Date :- 9.9.2020 SKT/-

Mohd. Saif v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Saif v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Urmila Devi Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Avdhesh Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Gajanan Dubey Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Ayub Vs State of U.P.

Tajeem Vs State of U.P.

Mustakeem Vs State of U.P.