Ram Nath v. Zonal Manager L.I.C. Varanasi and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear, while the Standing Counsel for the respondent was present.
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear, while the Standing Counsel for the respondent was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 51233 of 2008
Petitioner :- Ram Nath Respondent :- Zonal Manager L.I.C. Varanasi And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- K.S. Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- R.C. Shukla,Jitendra Shankar Pandey,SC
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List is being revised. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner whereas Sri D.K.Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent is present.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 14.10.2019 Sanjeev
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Ram Nath
Zonal Manager L.I.C. Varanasi
Another
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court