This order on a civil miscellaneous withdrawal application allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn without further liberty, and any interim order was discharged.
Withdrawal application allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim order discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2646 of 2008
Petitioner :- The Punjab Transport Co And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh,A.K. Singh,M.K. Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arjun Singhal,Siddharth Saran,Siddharth Verma
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Order on Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 192483 of 2010.
Sri Ashish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioner has filed a withdrawal application for withdrawing the writ petition. Sri Manvendra Dixit, learned Standing Counsel for the state is present.
The withdrawal application is allowed.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn without any further liberty.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 14.10.2019 Shiraz
The Punjab Transport Co And Others
State Of U.P. And Others
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
