The writ petition filed by the Union of India was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was not present in court on the listed date. Any interim order, if one existed, was vacated.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39694 of 2009
Petitioner :- Union Of India Thru G.M. Diesel Locomotive And Another Respondent :- Central Information Commission New Delhi And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shekhar Kumar Yadav, Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List is being revised. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner whereas Sri S.K.Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent is present.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 14.10.2019 Sanjeev
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Union Of India Thru G.M. Diesel Locomotive And Another
Central Information Commission New Delhi And Others
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
