The Court dismissed the writ petition for want of locus standi, as the petitioner failed to establish standing or show any legal injury calling for judicial interference.
No relief; petition dismissed for lack of locus standi.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19670 of 2019 Petitioner :- Bhagwat Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gulab Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and perused the record.
Upon a query made by this Court, the petitioner failed to establish his locus standi to file this writ petition. Moreover, there is nothing on record to show that any legal injury has been caused to the petitioner which may call for any interference by this Court.
The writ petition is not maintainable and is, accordingly, dismissed for want of locus standi.
Order Date :- 2.7.2019 Rishabh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has locus standi to file the writ petition.
Whether any legal injury has been caused to the petitioner requiring judicial interference.
Bhagwat Prasad
State Of U.P.
Shashi Kant Gupta
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
