Single judge disposed of the writ petition immediately after recording the respondent commission's undertaking to issue an appropriate response within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1801 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ram Baksh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Upendra Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Sri M.N. Singh, learned Counsel appearing for the Commission states that the communication as addressed by the second respondent and as comprised in Annexure-7 to the writ petition shall be duly attended to and an appropriate response forwarded with expedition and preferably within a period of four weeks from today.
In view of the statement so made which is recorded and accepted, nothing further survives on this petition at this stage, which shall stand disposed of. It is open for the State respondents to take a final decision taking into account the recommendations/advise that may be received by them in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 5.2.2019 LA/-
Ram Baksh
State Of U.P.
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
