The Division Bench dismissed an intra-Court appeal that had arisen from a single Judge's judgment which was subsequently dismissed by a Division Bench and finally rejected by the Supreme Court via Special Leave to Appeal.
The intra-Court appeal was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 135 of 2019
Appellant :- Satish Kumar And 25 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Pushkar Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jay Ram Pandey,Nisheeth Yadav
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 22.4.2019 Manoj
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 135 of 2019
Appellant :- Satish Kumar And 25 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Pushkar Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jay Ram Pandey,Nisheeth Yadav
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
"Heard.
We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order(s) in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
The Special leave petition are accordingly, dismissed.
However, dismissal of these special leave petitions will not be an
impediment for the petitioners to make representation before the appropriate authority / State Government and the same shall be considered on its own merits."
Order Date :- 22.4.2019 Manoj
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the intra-Court appeal arising from the final judgment of the Supreme Court should be maintained.
Whether the dismissal of the final appeal before the Supreme Court barred the further appeal under the High Court Rules.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Janardan Rai and 304 others vs. State of U.P. and 3 OthersReferred¶17
Janardan Rai and 304 others vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others (Special Appeal No. 605 of 2018)
Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 28338 of 2018Referred¶17
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Satish Kumar And 25 Others
State Of U.P. And 7 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
