This thin order dismisses a PIL regarding a liquor shop location. The Court found the shop distance from the school and highway complied with Apex Court guidelines, resulting in no cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 362 of 2019
Petitioner :- Vikas Kumar Dubey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
& Anr. (2017) 2 SCC 281 .
Order Date :- 19.4.2019 KA
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Tamil Nadu Vs. K.Balu & Anr.Referred¶6
State of Tamil Nadu Vs. K.Balu & Anr. (2017) 2 SCC 281 · Who else cites this
Vikas Kumar Dubey
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
