In this PIL concerning encroachment on Waqf property, the court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner had an available statutory remedy under Section 54 of the Waqf Act, 1995 which had not been invoked.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 160 of 2019
Petitioner :- Khalid Respondent :- State of U.P. and others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Singh Chauhan, Avinash Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Punit Kumar Gupta
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 19.4.2019 PS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petitioner approaching this court for removal of encroachment on Waqf property has exhausted statutory alternative remedies.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Khalid
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
