Intra-Court appeal involving writ petitions dismissed by a Single Judge and a Division Bench. Supreme Court dismissed the appeal but allowed further representation. This appeal is dismissed by reference to previous orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 564 of 2018
Appellant :- Rajeev Kumar And 24 Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Manoj Kumar Singh,Ashutosh Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Virendra Chaubey
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
"Heard.
We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order(s) in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
The Special leave petition are accordingly, dismissed.
However, dismissal of these special leave petitions will not be an impediment for the petitioners to make representation before the appropriate authority / State Government and the same shall be considered on its own merits."
Order Date :- 22.4.2019 Manoj
Rajeev Kumar And 24 Ors.
State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
