Appeal in default due to non-appearance of the appellantDespite revised calls, learned counsel for appellant was not presentAppellants available since previous datesThe appeal was dismissed by defaultInterim order, if any, stands vacated
The appeal is dismissed in default; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 25
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 677 of 2004
Appellant :- Ujagar Singh & Another Respondent :- Smt. Satrupa & Others Counsel for Appellant :- G.S. Singh Gautam Counsel for Respondent :- T.K.Tripathi,Ajeet Singh Rana,Jai Prakash Tripathi,R.K.Pandey,Rai Kishor Pandey,Rajesh Kumar
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Inspite of revised call none is for the appellant, whereas learned counsel for the respondents are present. On previous dates too none was for the appellant and notice was issued counsel for the appellant but none is present for the appellant.
The appeal is dismissed in default of the appellant.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 16.1.2019 Pcl
Ujagar Singh & Another
Smt. Satrupa & Others
Ram Krishna Gautam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
