Dismissed

Pranjal Singh Alias Raj Thakur v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC11 Jan 2019A482/1382/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application for quashing criminal proceedings was dismissed after applicant offered to surrender and apply for bail. Court directed bail consideration within 30 days and barred coercive action if applicant appeared in time.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed. Bail to be considered if applicant surrenders and applies within 30 days. No coercive action during this period if present.

Pranjal Singh Alias Raj Thakur Vs State of Up… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 25 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1382 of 2019 Applicant :- Pranjal Singh Alias Raj Thakur Opposite Party :- State Of Up And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Siddharth Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.

¶3

This application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceeding of Criminal Case arising out of Case Crime no. 368 of 2018, u/s 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3(2) (va) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Kydganj, District Allahabad, along with Charge-sheet No. 1 of 2018 pending in the court of Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Allahabad.

¶4

At the very out-set learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants submits that he does not want to press the principal prayers seeking quashing of the charge sheet and the entire proceeding as have been made in the application. He is ready to submit to the jurisdiction of the court, seek bail and accept all the conditions which this Court may deem fit to impose upon him. The only prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicants is that the hearing of the bail application may be done on the same day.

¶5

Heard learned AGA and perused the record.

¶6

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicants the application so far as it relates to seeking quashing of the charge sheet and the entire proceeding and so far as it relates to seeking stay of the proceeding, stands dismissed.

¶7

However, it is directed that if the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.

¶8

For a period of 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.

¶9

With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed off .

¶10

Order Date :- 11.1.2019/Pcl

Pranjal Singh Alias Raj Thakur v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pranjal Singh Alias Raj Thakur v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagwat Sharma Vs State of U.P.

Bharat Dwivedi Vs State of U.P.

Vinod Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Dinesh Kumar and 02 Others Vs State of Up and Another

Lekh Ram and 04 Others Vs State of Up and 02 Others

Smt. Neetu Tyagi Vs State of U.P. and 6 Ors.