This court dismissed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. filed against judgments convicting accused under Sections 323 and 325 IPC. The judge found no manifest error or illegality warranting interference and vacated any interim orders.
Revision petition dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1617 of 1995
Revisionist :- Narain Lal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- B.D.Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,A. K. Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 13.9.2019 Manish Himwan
2 issues framed by the court
Whether manifest error or illegality justifies interference in the criminal revision.
Whether to allow or dismiss the revision petition.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Narain Lal
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
