Rajendra Prasad Sharma v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal revision filed under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C., the High Court, per Sudhir Agarwal, J., noted the revisionist did not appear. The bench perused the record under its own motion. Finding no manifest error or illegality warranting interference in the conviction, the court dismissed the appeal and vacated interim orders.
What did the court decide?
Criminal revision dismissed; interim order vacated; judgment certified to lower court.