Criminal Revision filed challenging a conviction with release under probation and subsequent dismissal of appeal. Court perused record and found no manifest error or illegality to warrant interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1277 of 1996
Revisionist :- Ghar Bharan Yadav And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- S. Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether manifest error, illegality or procedural irregularity justified interference in the impugned judicial and appeal orders.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ghar Bharan Yadav And Others
State Of U.P. And Others
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
