This criminal revision petition under Cr.P.C. was dismissed because the learned counsel failed to demonstrate any factual or legal error in the lower court's order rejecting the maintenance application.
The criminal revision application is dismissed; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1208 of 1996
Revisionist :- Smt.Lata Agarwal Opposite Party :- Piyush Agarwal Counsel for Revisionist :- A.K.Goyal Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any error in facts or law is evident in the Family Court's rejection of the maintenance application to justify criminal revision interference.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Lata Agarwal
Piyush Agarwal
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
