Foolwa v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court, on criminal revision under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C., held that no manifest error or illegality was apparent in the impugned order and dismissed the revision, vacating any interim orders.
What did the court decide?
Criminal revision dismissed; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1589 of 1995
Revisionist :- Foolwa Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Vishistha Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
- Called in revise. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
- This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., has been filed aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 12.09.1995 passed by III Additional Sessions Judge, Deoria in Criminal Revision No.290 of 1993 under Sections 323 IPC whereby judgment and order dated 27.10.1993 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoria has been set aside, allowing the revision. Being aggrieved by said judgment and order, Revisionist has preferred present revision.
- Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
- Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
- Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is any manifest error or illegality in the impugned order to justify interference in the criminal revision.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Foolwa
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1589/1995
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court