The Court dismissed the contempt application for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the applicant in the revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1161 of 2014
Applicant :- M/S Shri Prashant Tewari Opposite Party :- Rajesh Kumar D.R.M. Jhansi Counsel for Applicant :- Kalyan Sundaram Srivastav,Sandeep Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.,Prabhakar Singh
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
The matter is listed as peremptorily.
List has been revised. No one appears for the applicant in revised call.
Counter affidavit has been filed by Shri Prabhakar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party.
The contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Notices, if any, stand discharged.
Order Date :- 8.5.2019 SP/
M/S Shri Prashant Tewari
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
