In this contempt application, the applicant failed to appear despite a revised list. The court dismissed the application for want of prosecution and discharged any notice.
Contempt application dismissed for want of prosecution; notice, if any, discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1395 of 2014
Applicant :- Sahab Singh And 41 Others Opposite Party :- Sarvendra Vikram Bahadur Singh Director S.C.E.R.T. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Shailesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
List has been revised. No one appears for the applicant in revised call. The contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Notice, if any, stand discharge.
Order Date :- 7.5.2019 A. Pandey
Sahab Singh And 41 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
