The High Court dismissed a writ petition for default. The petitioner did not appear despite the respondent's counsel being present. An interim order, if any, was discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22094 of 2018
Petitioner :- Satyapal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jagdev Singh,Shiv Pratap Singh Rathore Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jagdev Singh
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
List has been revised. None appears to press this writ petition even though the learned counsel for the respondents is present. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 9.7.2018 MLK
Satyapal Singh
State Of U.P.
Shashi Kant Gupta
Rajiv Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
