The petitioner stated they did not wish to press the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition on that ground.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18095 of 2018
Petitioner :- Pashu Shavchhedan Evam Charmshodhan Audyogik Utpadan Sahakari Samiti Limited
Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nand Lal Pandey, Suyash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Anil Kumar,Ashok Kumar Pandey, Siddhartha Srivastava
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
At the very outset Sri Nand Lal Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that he does not want to press this petition, as such, it may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 9.7.2018 Arun
Pashu Shavchhedan Evam Charmshodhan Audyogik Utpadan Sahakari Samiti Limited
State Of U P
Shashi Kant Gupta
Rajiv Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
